justinjackson.ca
|
ksl
|
|
Justin Jackson wrote a piece less about Claude Code failing and more about what happens to teams when it works too well. His argument: when AI coding tools compress cycle times and flatten skill gaps, the usual team hierarchy starts crumbling – specialists lose their edge, roles blur, and collaboration patterns that worked for years stop making sense. The technology itself performs remarkably, but nobody is talking about the organizational turbulence that follows. Jackson proposes AI-enabled pair programming and co-ownership models as a way forward. It’s a concern that tracks with what engineering managers at companies using Cursor, Copilot, and Claude Code have been quietly grappling with – the tooling outpaced the org design.
