New Delhi [India], June 30 (ANI): The Delhi High Court has permitted a 17-year-old boy to donate a portion of his liver to his father suffering from advanced chronic liver disease, while directing the Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences (ILBS), Vasant Kunj, to carry out the transplant procedure in strict compliance with all legal, ethical and clinical protocols to ensure the minor’s health and safety.Justice Mini Pushkarna passed the order while allowing a writ petition filed by the minor through his mother and natural guardian, seeking permission under the Transplantation of Human Organs and Tissues Act, 1994, and the Transplantation of Human Organs and Tissues Rules, 2014, to donate part of his liver to his father, Uttam Kumar Shaw.The Court directed that the transplant procedure involving the minor donor be undertaken in accordance with all statutory, ethical and clinical safeguards. It also recorded the submission of ILBS that the hospital had been awaiting the Court’s order and would now expeditiously schedule the surgery.The Court noted that although living organ donation by minors is ordinarily prohibited, Rule 5(3)(g) of the 2014 Rules permits such donations in exceptional medical circumstances, subject to prior approval of the Appropriate Authority and the State Government.During the hearing, the Government of NCT of Delhi placed before the Court a letter dated June 29, 2026, recording the approval of the Lieutenant Governor of Delhi and the Appropriate Authority permitting the minor to donate part of his liver to his father.The Court observed that the petitioner’s father is suffering from chronic liver disease with cirrhosis, portal hypertension, mild ascites and hepatocellular carcinoma, and that liver transplantation was the only viable life-saving treatment. It further noted that all other near relatives had been evaluated and the minor son was found to be the only medically suitable donor.The Court also recorded that the petitioner, though a minor aged about 17 years and six months, was physically fit and willing to donate a portion of his liver voluntarily out of natural love and affection for his father, without any commercial or coercive element.Observing that denying permission could result in the loss of the father’s life, the Court held that the balance of convenience overwhelmingly favoured permitting the transplant. It exercised its jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution and allowed the minor to donate part of his liver to his father. (ANI)
